Total shares are traded on the Paris Stock Exchange under the ticker "FP". Total is a French oil and gas company whose origins date back to 1924 and which has more than 100,000 employees. It ranks fifth among the six supermajors, the largest companies in the sector worldwide.
Total share valuation
With the French giant having suffered losses in 2020 due to the Chinese virus, we will expressly set aside valuation ratios based exclusively on last year's profit. The stock is currently trading at:
- 16.34 times average recurring earnings: fair
- 0.98 times book value: cheap
- 1.45 times tangible assets: cheap
- 25.24 times the free cash flow of the last financial year: expensive, but explained by Covid
- 15.71 average free cash flow: correct
So far, the stock seems pretty cheap. Considering the negative price performance of the last few years, we can say that this is consistent.
Total share dividend
By focusing on the dividend, we can only be reassured in our choice, since it offers a very attractive yield of 6.7%! The company did not hesitate to increase it, despite last year's poor results, declaring itself "confident in the group's fundamentals". The dividend has thus increased by more than 4% per year over the last five years.
However, on closer inspection, despite the optimism of the management, not everything is so rosy. The degree of coverage of the dividend by the results raises some serious concerns, since it represents:
- 203% of current free cash flow (which can certainly be explained by the virus)
- 140% of the average profit of the last five years
- 130% of average free cash flow
There is no miracle. A very high dividend yield is almost always synonymous with a distribution ratio problematic.
Results and liquidity
While Total's earnings, dividend, cash reserves and asset values are rising over the long term, the French giant has already seen a decline in its net profit in 2019, before going into the red last year. This, among other things, explains the decline in the share price since 2018, well before the coronavirus-related fall.
Despite this, liquidity is sufficient, with a current ratio of 1.23 (up) and a quick ratio of 1.
Profitability and profitability
The gross margin is good, with 36.5% (also up). The free cash flow margin is more problematic, with 3.3%, but is explained by the health context. The same goes for the CFROA, with 5.5%.
Debt
Total considers itself to have "good financial strength". The long-term debt ratio to assets is still 22% (a sharp increase compared to the previous financial year). It is true that the total debt amounts to 0.73 times equity, which is still acceptable. However, the French company would need twelve years to amortize it using its free cash flow, which is far too much.
We had seen that the valuation of the stock seemed a priori quite cheap. Let's see what happens when we compare its fundamentals not to the price (capitalization) but to the enterprise value, which precisely takes into account debt:
- Current EV/FCF ratio: 36.22 => very expensive (but partly explained by the virus)
- Average EV/FCF ratio: 23.22 => expensive
This changes the situation considerably and confirms the warning already given by the dividend distribution ratio.
Return for the shareholder
Total has still managed to generate, thanks to the repayment of its net debt, an average annual return for the shareholder of 4.5% over the last five years. However, this should be put into perspective, because at the same time the company issued shares, representing a negative average annual return for the shareholder of -1.73%. In total, between the dividend, the repayment of the net debt and the issuance of shares, the average annual return for the shareholder amounts to a fairly impressive 10.4%. Be careful though, because as we saw for the dividend, the company used 165% of its FCF to finance these operations. It is a safe bet that in the future Total will no longer be able to be as generous to its owners.
Risks related to Total shares
The volatility of the FP stock over the last twelve months is acceptable, with 32%. The beta is at the market level, with 1. It is more from the point of view of the fundamentals that it is lacking, contrary to what the company claims. The Z-Score (Altman) is in the red zone, at 0.8, while the F-Score (Piotroski) is only 4. In summary, the company is financially unsound and the stock is likely to underperform in the future. The Z-Score even suggests that the company could go bankrupt. Obviously, that was due in the time of our ancestors, when bankruptcies still existed. Nowadays, with the policy of zero interest rates and central banks that buy up everything, Total still has a bright future ahead of it.
In short
Contrary to what a superficial analysis of the French giant might suggest, focusing only on the price variation or the incredibly generous dividend, the stock is anything but an opportunity. Let's note that institutional investors are jostling for position (despite their good greenwashing intentions), including: T. Rowe, BlackRock, Lyxor, Amundi, Vanguard, Norges Bank, BNP Paribas. I imagine that there will be quite a stir when one of them presses the red button...
Discover more from dividendes
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Thank you Jerome for this new analysis, with a rigorous and uncompromising approach. It is always a pleasure to read your analyses.
Regarding Total, I think it would be interesting to complete the analysis with a less objective approach than that based on the figures in the balance sheet and the profit and loss accounts, namely by thinking about the market for petroleum products, and therefore the demand and supply in this area. Of course, this exercise is difficult and somewhat random, because it requires knowing the world reserves, the world production capacities, the speed at which changes in energy consumption will occur, not to mention that all this also depends on political factors. To do this properly, it would also be necessary to know how Total is positioned in relation to its competitors (who has what reserves [quantity] under contract, who has the lowest production costs [extraction, transformation, transport] [quality], and therefore a competitive advantage [extraction in the Middle Eastern sands is cheaper than in the North Sea for example], who is present for sale in which markets [demand will not evolve uniformly throughout the world), etc. And what are Total's "alternative" investments to aim for diversification.
Today, we see that the price of petroleum products is on the rise after the "coronakrach" of March 2020 (while still being far from the peaks before the crash of 2008 and the period 2010-2014; note that the price of a barrel took off quite strongly around the year 2000, after the 90s at relatively stable and low levels). This should be favorable to Total, for the 2021 financial year in any case.
In general, we are currently seeing a significant increase in the price of raw materials.
Hi Laurent
Thank you for your comment.
"It would be interesting to complete the analysis with a less objective approach than that based on the figures in the balance sheet and profit and loss accounts, namely by considering the market for petroleum products, and therefore the demand and supply in this area..."
I never do this kind of analysis. This is where we enter the realm of projections and conjectures. In this little game, few people are right, and as the saying goes, even a broken clock gives the right time twice a day. I prefer to base myself on what is known and very real. This avoids unpleasant surprises.
This analysis is not worth much since it is based on the figures for 2020, which were very affected by the "Chinese virus" (yet another nonsense in this article) and especially by the endemic stupidity of OECD governments (a very "Western" virus this one).
The dividend is assured, according to the management, with a barrel at 26$, so nothing to worry about.
Certainly the debt (i.e., the investment) weighs, but this must be compared to the other majors and especially analyzed according to the sector (obviously very costly in CAPEX) and in the eyes of the investment and development policy of the company which is in full mutation.
"This analysis is not worth much since it is based on the figures from 2020, which were very affected by the "Chinese virus" (yet another nonsense from this article)"
As I mentioned several times in the article, I specifically indicated what was structural or cyclical (and therefore the virus – no one is offended that the variants are called English, Indian or Brazilian).
“Chinese virus” (yet another piece of nonsense from this article)
what nonsense? the virus comes from china => chinese virus, not afraid of words, nor of reality, nor of the chinese ^^
Thanks Jérome for the analysis, I am personally a shareholder of Total 😀
Thanks Psycoke 😉
Here is one who would do better to buy and read CAREFULLY Jérôme's book. It is always good to seek to have opposing opinions, we thus realize the quality of the articles on this site and the wealth of knowledge shared!
A big THANK YOU dividendes.ch!
Thank you AGU, that touches me. 😉
"This analysis is not worth much..."
My point of view: this analysis is incredibly accurate and transparent, in short an analysis like you will never see from a bank.
On the other hand, if there is something that is not worth much, it is indeed Total's stock.
A word to the wise is enough.
I always liked your great respect for bankers Dividinde 🙂
If you knew in detail what I think about politicians, I assure you that bankers would appear next to me as real angels 🙂
Same for me. During a late night drinking session I even had a fight with one of them 😉
I came across a recent analysis of Total by Hiboo yesterday:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bd85A2Rp52I
The approach is quite different from that of Jérôme, because it is not exclusively accounting. Hiboo also takes into account subjective elements.