There Rat Race will never cease to impress me. The capitalist world has inexhaustible and unsuspected resources to condition our lives, suck up our income and make us work. I recently had three examples that I would like to share with you.
A few weeks ago, I invited a group of friends to come and eat at home. A few days before the meal, a girl told me that she had recently converted to "vegan" and asked me if she could bring her food with her, knowing that I am a carnivore from the very beginning. No problem for me, I even offered to cook something specially for her, but she preferred to bring "her products". On the day in question, she took out of a bag, obviously from one of our Swiss distribution giants, a kind of pseudo minced steak wrapped in plastic. I put it in the pan, wondering how you cook a steak without meat, the very concept of "rare" being totally irrelevant here. I wondered especially about what was in it. Since I know a bit about cooking and nutrition, I'm already making a small, amused mental image of the instructions written in small print on the back of the packaging, which I ignored and threw in my trash, out of politeness towards my guest. Not exactly zero waste either. Once the meal is over and the guests have left, I throw myself on the trash in search of the object that arouses all my curiosity. No mistake. Full of crap like modified corn starch E 1442, thickener E 461, various flavors... Even more surprising: sugar and orange juice! In the end, the protein content is low relative to meat (14g/100), with a proportion of carbohydrates almost as high. Not to mention that this crap sells for almost the same price as a real ground steak. In short, veganism, originally a movement supposed to make us eat healthier and more cheaply, has been taken over by industrialists to make us eat even worse while paying a high price. Let's be clear, even if I love meat, I'm not criticizing this way of life. Everyone eats what they want. What I'm pointing out is how capitalism manages to transform a risk into an opportunity and how most of us, simple consumers, fall into the trap.
In the same vein, I recently saw a report on TV that said that sales of water bottles were currently exploding. Riding the wave of "zero waste", manufacturers have started to produce containers of all shapes, materials and colors imaginable, with patterns for all tastes. This has been taken up by "stars" who show themselves with "their" water bottles, which have become, in spite of themselves, a fashion item. So yes, of course, it is better to fill your water bottle with tap water and reuse it for many years, rather than buying PET bottles. That being said, given the turn of events, I would tend to believe that the cure in this case is worse than the disease. Everything suggests that these water bottles, made of hard plastic or even metal, will end up in the trash in a few months, when their colors and patterns have faded or simply gone out of fashion. I can see kids in the aisles begging their parents to buy the latest "Pokémon" or "Paw Patrol"... So we end up with a situation almost identical to veganism, with a capitalist world that manages to make new profits from an a priori threat, while making the situation even worse, with the blessing of consumers. I am already looking forward to the new debates in a few years around the pollution caused by these gourds, followed by new remedies proposed by manufacturers and the immediate reaction of the consumer sheep.
The last example is a little different but gives even more food for thought. A few evenings ago I came across a "health" documentary about the skin. Starting from the observation that soap had an unfortunate tendency to dry it out, an individual showered for a week with just water. A check-up by a dermatologist was carried out before and after. The verdict was clear: a clear improvement in the condition of the skin, less dry, fewer spots, redness and itching. In terms of odors, after the first few days of adaptation, there was no difference. In other words, soap (and any lotions/creams to moisturize the skin from the dryness it causes) can simply be thrown in the trash. Ok, you might ask, what is this cosmetics course doing here? It's simple. Our parents soap us for the first time within 24 hours of our birth. Right after Pampers, this is the first consumer good that is imposed on us. Unlike the first, this one will continue to accompany us throughout our adult lives (we find Pampers much later, but that's another story). We are conditioned to wash ourselves with it, to the point that it becomes just inconceivable to see things otherwise. If you have never read the cave myth, I encourage you to do it, because here, through this tiny example, all of humanity is immersed in it. What a godsend for Procter & Gamble or Unilever. Imagine if we all freed ourselves from this little chain, overnight. It could be done with a simple snap of the fingers, a little tweet that goes viral, and no one would soap themselves anymore. I dare not imagine the faces of the leaders of the two aforementioned companies. The dividends would certainly not be paid the following year!
Discover more from dividendes
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Well seen. Yes indeed, the reason for the existence of marketers and companies is to have customers to sell them things or services, whatever they may be, in order to generate a profit. They adapt their offers to what customers ask for or to what they could potentially ask for, for better or for worse. I have nothing against this model, even if it can sometimes lead to funny, aberrant, stupid, annoying situations. But who is responsible for these situations? In my opinion, the responsible party is the consumer, either because his priorities are elsewhere, or because he doesn't care, or because he is lazy, or because he is ignorant, or because he has a lack of intelligence. But it is true that the parameters that must be taken into account are very numerous and sometimes contradictory. In the end, in most cases it is always the consumer who has the choice to buy or not a thing or a service, or to prefer one thing or service to another.
Warning: I am not giving a moral lesson. Even if I try to think before I buy, I am not exemplary, and probably not by a long shot. Who can claim to be truly exemplary in our society, living "normally"? Nobody. We all are, more or less, but never completely.
A small trendy example. Today, under pressure from increasingly strict standards designed to reduce air pollution and combat global warming (oh so laudable objectives), car manufacturers are producing or preparing to produce electric vehicles. But are they the panacea? Probably not, even if they have certain advantages. They do not pollute while driving, but how is the electricity that powers them produced? Today, mainly with nuclear, gas, oil and coal, with renewable energies still largely in the minority. And if the electric car fleet increases, more electricity will have to be produced. The electric car does not pollute, but the factory that produces its "fuel" generally pollutes. And how are the electric car and its batteries built? And how are this car and its batteries then recycled? Is the energy and environmental balance of these cars really better? I am not sure. So, we must temper our sense of good conscience by buying an electric vehicle (which is not bad in itself, but we must not sell it to us as THE solution with only advantages!).
And the hydrogen car? Producing hydrogen is very energy-intensive.
Etc.
Indeed, the electric car is another blatant example of how capitalism manages to transform a risk into an opportunity, with the blessing of consumers' ignorance. The electric vehicle is certainly less bad in terms of carbon emissions, but it generates other significant pollution, notably because of the batteries. If electric cars are skyrocketing in demand, it is certainly partly because of the new pseudo ecological awareness of certain consumers, but it is mainly because the automobile industry had the means to do so, while seeing it as a tremendous opportunity to completely renew the global automobile fleet in the coming decades. A new market, in other words. Not to mention that they are helped by Western governments who see it, under the cover of ecology, as a very effective way to free themselves from their dependence on the Middle East. In short, everyone seems to be a winner... in appearance at least.
I agree with you when you say that consumers are largely responsible for this whole circus. The consumer is by definition stupid, giving the image of a totally passive being, imbued with marketing and crashing his wallet (and credit) to satisfy all his desires. And the situation has gotten even worse since the advent of the Internet. While this social network was invented by CERN to network brains, FB and IG are now mainly used to connect human stupidity in real time. They even do it in a damn effective way!
1- "I throw myself on the garbage in search of the object" haha but what an incredible play on words! I love reading you because in addition to being a wise man, you are a comedian. I think we have to be careful not to put all vegans in the same boat as your friend. I think there is a way to be vegan and have a high source of protein without eating sh… I agree, however, that everything that is Beyond Meat / Impossible Foods has been proven to be unhealthy and in addition to being very expensive it is averagely good. No chance that I will invest in Beyond Meat on the stock market by the way!
2- It reminds me of the electric scooters that end up in the Seine in Paris. Supposedly good for environmental awareness but ultimately an incredible ecological disaster, especially caused by the low intelligence of collective society.
3- I had seen this article. I do not question their results for a sedentary person, but clearly the test people did not do any sport! I would have a hard time not using soap after sweating like a pig and stinking like a pig… I think my girlfriend agrees with me too haha!
1) I agree, we need to differentiate between "native" vegans and "conditioned" vegans (the majority). The former live in accordance with their convictions while the latter are unconsciously victims of marketing, fashion and the Internet, especially "influencers" (I love this term...). Today, with social networks and the group effect they generate, it has become impossible or almost impossible to know what is marketing and what is information.
2) Very good example! In the same kind of nonsense we can also cite the scrappage premium which encourages you to change your old car for a new one, under the cover of ecological reasons. Paradoxical! And well organized by the automobile lobby.
3) So the guy was apparently an athlete. Nevertheless I did the test, being a big sports fan myself, and I have to say, especially this summer, that it was still not 100% effective. So I made a compromise: Marseille soap in strategic places after sport, the rest of the time with water. And it's perfect. Healthy, economical and ecological.