Nestle (NESN:VTX) Analysis

No need to introduce this Swiss multinational with 303,000 employees, present in 189 countries, with more than 2,000 brands, and active in the food sector since 1866.

Valuation & dividend

Let's say it right away: Nestlé is currently totally overpriced. In fact, the stock is trading at:

  • 38.55 times current recurring earnings
  • 25.31 times average recurring earnings
  • 23.14 times tangible assets
  • 4.02 times assets
  • 2.73 times sales
  • 27.92 times current free cash flow
  • 24.71 times the average free cash flow

The EBITDA only amounts to 3,78% of the enterprise value, which confirms the stratospheric valuation of the title.

If Nestlé is not worth buying for its profits, assets, sales or free cash flow, let's see what it is like in relation to the dividend. This does indeed seem surprisingly attractive, with a yield of 2.93%. In these times, this is rare enough to be noted. But it should also make us pay attention. Such a ratio with such valuations is indeed never a very good omen. If we look more closely, we see that the dividend amounts to:

  • 112.99% of current recurring profits
  • 74.20% average recurring profits
  • 81.82% of current free cash flow
  • 72.41% of average free cash flow

All this while earnings per share have been steadily declining since 2014... Buying Nestlé for its apparently generous dividend therefore carries a certain risk. Not only is its future growth compromised (the average annual growth over the last five years has only amounted to 1,79%), but in addition, without a reversal in the earnings trend, distributions may even decrease.

So we have looked everywhere, but it is impossible to find anything interesting at Nestlé at the moment, given its excessive valuation.

Balance sheet & result

Profits are falling, the dividend is almost stagnant, but at least the value of assets and cash reserves are increasing over the long term. Nestlé is therefore still managing to create some value for its shareholders, which is reflected in a slight increase in the share price of 26.77% over the last five years.

Cash reserves are nevertheless low, with a current ratio of 0.83 (a very slight decrease compared to the previous year) and a quick ratio of 0.59. The Swiss multinational is therefore faced with current financial obligations greater than its immediate resources. Nothing too worrying, however, for a company of this caliber that has several strings to its bow to pay its bills. Nestlé is not going bankrupt tomorrow, which is confirmed by a comfortable Z-Score (Altman) of 3.8.

Even though the gross margin is slightly down compared to the previous year, it remains very comfortable, with 50%. The free cash flow margin and the net margin are not left behind, with 9,78% and 7,08%. Profitability is also good, with an ROA of 4,77% (down), a CFROA of 10,12% and an ROE of 10,43%.

The long-term debt-to-asset ratio has increased quite significantly compared to the previous year, currently standing at 13.94%. This is nevertheless quite acceptable, as the entire debt could be wiped out in just three years by the average free cash flow achieved by Nestlé. The debt also represents only 0.49 times equity.

Another interesting point: the number of shares outstanding tends to decrease over the long term, which is good news for shareholders since the share of the pie allocated to them increases at the same time.

Conclusion

Nestlé is a pretty extraordinary company. Not only has it been active for over 150 years, but it also relies on very good margins, profitability that is quite correct for its sector of activity, intelligent debt and relatively low expenditure on equipment needs. Nestlé is a strong brand, which relies on a gigantic sales and production network, particularly in emerging countries. It is not the first competitor that will be able to overshadow it. Due to its sector of activity, it is also relatively protected from the risks of technological obsolescence and economic upheavals. This is also confirmed by a beta of only 0.76 and a volatility of 8.68%. This is very defensive! The Vevey-based company may not be a franchise like McDonald's or Coca-Cola, but it undeniably shares many characteristics with them.

That said, as we saw at the beginning of the presentation, Nestlé is currently trading, like most stocks, at a price that is completely disconnected from reality. You would have to be reckless to venture there. Even its defensive nature cannot protect it from a correction of such a valuation. At the beginning of the 21st century, it has already lost 40% of its value in less than a year. I believe that it is quite capable of doing at least as much damage, especially if earnings per share continue to melt like snow in the sun, and the dividend has to be lowered as a result.

Finally, let us note that the F-Score (Piotroski) is four. This indicator gives us an idea of the financial strength of a company and is also a fairly effective indicator of the future performance of its stock price. Four points out of the nine possible in the Piotroski scale is quite low, and therefore not very encouraging for the future...


Discover more from dividendes

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

7 thoughts on “Analyse de Nestlé (NESN:VTX)”

  1. Thank you for this analysis. For me, the future of Nestlé is not the clearest: the new CEO comes from the world of pharma and the activist fund Third Point (D. Loeb) is using all its weight to influence the strategy (it seeks among other things to sell the stake in L'Oréal and pushes for an increase in debt; some think that it would aim to split the company into three separate companies). I think that Nestlé is at a pivotal moment in its history. When it is not clear, I tend to abstain; that said, the future is not necessarily bad for shareholders.

    1. Not necessarily bad, except that the price should dissuade more than one. And as you rightly said, when it's not clear, it's better to abstain.

  2. I agree that Nestlé is not a buy at the moment, but for me it is a hold. It is THE defensive value par excellence that gives stability to the portfolio, with several decades of increasing dividends in the background.

    Excluding non-recurring effects, the 2018 PER is estimated at 21 and the payout ratio is slightly over two-thirds. It is expensive but acceptable for such a monster of consistency.

    The new CEO has set an organic growth target of 4 to 6% in the medium term (compared to 2.8% in the first half of 2018 and 2.3 the previous year). He is already on the right track and his competence is no longer in doubt (see Fresenius).

    Finally, Ulf Mark Schneider's stated desire to focus on higher-margin, high-growth products (as illustrated by the collaboration with Starbucks) and to make new acquisitions point to growing future profits.

    I bought Nestle almost 10 years ago and have received more dividends every year since, not to mention the share price appreciation. It is definitely a stock I plan to hold for life – overvalued or not.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *