The Permanent Portfolio is interesting for the investor who avoids volatility (negative years with this approach are very rare), but at the expense of a loss of profitability compared to pure stocks. This is one of the reasons why more people are not getting into it.
Indeed, since stocks often perform strongly over many years, it is very difficult for most people to remain unmoved by the enormous potential gains that this represents. Having 3/4 of your portfolio invested elsewhere than in stocks during these providential periods is difficult to bear.
While the profitability of the Permanent Portfolio remains positive during periods of strong growth, it is nevertheless much lower than that of the stock market. You have to be pretty strong to keep your eyes closed when the stock market climbs by several dozen percentage points for many years in a row.
The other explanation is that these 4 assets correspond to 4 very specific types of investors: the entrepreneur (shares), the paranoid (gold), the materialist (cash) and the good father (bonds). We all have one of these hats, or even two, but much more rarely 3 or 4.
Some of these assets will be completely against our very nature, to the point that we will simply not be able to invest in them. For most people, stocks and gold are far too risky and speculative instruments. However, when we look more closely, even if it is more insidious, bonds and cash also have risks. Typically, cash and bonds do not protect against inflation.
As far as I'm concerned, it's gold that poses the most problems for me. I have a lot of trouble with this inert material that doesn't create wealth and that quite often comes down to pure speculation. Investing ¼ of my fortune in the yellow metal therefore seems insane to me. Nevertheless, I must admit that if I had been invested, even partially, in gold during the period 2000-2010, rather than almost 100% in shares, I would have been better off.
Conversely, I have no problem buying shares, even if I am more cautious these days. As for cash, even if I like to have some in anticipation of a future correction in the stock markets, to take advantage of new bargains, I also have a little trouble imagining keeping ¼ of my fortune in cash.
Discover more from dividendes
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
And yes, nothing beats long-term actions (read Jeremy Siegel's excellent books on this subject).
I didn't know this permanent portfolio, interesting but not my cup of tea. What surprised me is that it is not divided into 5 equal parts with 20% in real estate.
Ah my twin brother dividinde 🙂
I also read Siegel, whom I really like and who is also cited in my reference works
And then concerning your idea of 5 equal parts of 20% with real estate, it's another strategy that I'll talk about a little later. You're definitely very quick to relax 🙂
Dear Siamese twin. After much thought, I believe I have found the 5 in 1 solution:
Build a slanted house in Zion in gold, when it is in action, then play cash-cash there…
Well I think I'd better go and see somewhere else if I'm there...
Holy shit I had to reread 10 times before I understood… But I finally understood anyway. You brought out the same pills as the other day, my word!