A little random stroll

Une petite ballade au hasardI am currently reading Burton Markiel's Investment Bible, 'A Random Walk Down Wall Street’. En 1973 déjà, Burton Markiel a pris les armes et a démystifié les capacités des analystes, des courtiers et des gestionnaires de fortune à générer de l’alpha pour leurs clients. Il fut le premier à publier des études rigoureuses, avant que les PC existent et rendent le travail rapide, comparant les performances des uns et des autres avec le marché en général. La conclusion est toujours valable aujourd’hui : si on inclut les brokerage fees (et dans certains pays les impôts sur les gains en capitaux), il est impossible de battre l’indice de façon constante (donc sur plusieurs années consécutives) avec le même niveau de risque. C’était la première mise en cause de la gestion active et surtout la démonstration statistique que pour le commun des mortels, la gestion active fait perdre plus d’argent par rapport à l’indice que la gestion passive (les indices n’incluent pas de frais, la gestion passive est donc aussi ‘perdante’ face à l’indice, mais de façon plus modérée).

It should be noted that he didn't make only friends! An industry that generates billions for its employees was not going to let itself be done in so easily. Forty years later, things have barely changed, finance professionals are still trying to convince their private and institutional clients that they have the miracle recipe to make you earn money. How is it possible that in the face of clear, mathematical and statistical demonstrations, we still find clients ready to trade (and professionals to encourage them in this direction) when rationally it makes no sense?

READ  Investing in the stock market vs. casino: deciphering strategies, risks and gains to maximize your profits!

I think the answer is embedded in the human mind and its inability to face a certain reality can be explained as follows: human beings control some things and not others. The 'belief' in one's ability or that of one's financial advisor to generate alpha is based on the same irrationality as astrology: the need to believe that chance does not exist, that things are determined and, above all, that one can always influence them.

In our very distant past, when we were fighting for our survival, the choice was clear: if we did not find water, food, we died. If we got up to go hunting, we died. If we did not defend ourselves from our enemy, we were subject to his will. Over the millennia, we have been accustomed to being able to influence our destiny, which is a good thing. We continue to influence it today by the choices we make in our lives: studies, work, family, balance between everything. So I think that the power that human beings have gradually conquered over their destiny, the disappearance through rationalization of a number of beliefs that they had (the loss of influence of religions in our Western world is also a sign of the ascendancy of the rational over the irrational) has accustomed them to persuading themselves that they can control everything. And therefore also their investments. This coupled with his need to be active, to do rather than to undergo, creates an explosive mixture which still persuades people that we can do better than the index.

READ  Increase your income

Of course, there are serious publications to counter Malkiel's statements. He himself recognizes that in some cases, there may be repetitive trends, therefore exploitable, but they are marginal, largely confined to professionals and of little help to the average investor.

So we would all be better off adopting a buy-and-hold strategy or buying index ETFs to buy the market as a whole. But of course, that is less exciting and does not make for exciting living room discussions…


Discover more from dividendes

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

3 thoughts on “Une petite ballade au hasard”

  1. Martin the independent investor

    Good morning!

    Excellent article, with which, however, I totally disagree.

    Doing much better than the market with an active management strategy is entirely possible. However, you have to do your homework, in addition to demonstrating unfailing independence of mind.

    The beauty of the stock market, for the intelligent investor, is that the vast majority of those who enter it do not know what they are doing.
    Thus, a serious investor who relies on a rational investment method will do well in the long term to the detriment of speculators and other irrational investors.

    Martin

  2. Good morning,
    Thank you for this article, I appreciate the analysis and the angle chosen. I am interested, like many, in tips for earning more money and I venture tentatively into the field of investment. I read a lot of blogs and I really found this article enjoyable to read. Bravo.

  3. Good morning,

    Good article, which summarizes the book "A random walk down Wall Street" well. While I generally agree with these conclusions, it seems to me that certain "methodologies" nevertheless allow for better results than others.

    So I will contrast this excellent work with another equally excellent one in my opinion: "What works on Wall Street" by O'Shaughnessy. Without claiming to understand the why of things, the author notes, with statistics to support his claim, that taking into account certain ratios allows for superior results.

    The method that I explain and apply, oriented towards sustainable dividends, integrates the conclusions of these studies. And for the moment with success 🙂!

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *