I recently finished a (popularized) book on neuroscience and the subliminal activity of the brain. In a nutshell, most of the decisions we make, and believe we make deliberately, are actually pre-programmed and predictable (today we are able to detect with a scanner the moment a decision is made and it is always before we are aware of it). What a lesson in modesty and humility! Philosophers are now joining the discussion to determine what represents the real free will of the human being, but that is not the point of this intervention. What seems interesting to me is to have here a confirmation of what behavioral finance has taught us in the last 10 years: we make irrational, illogical, contradictory decisions, are more sensitive to losses than to gains, are influenced by many factors that have nothing to do with an economic approach, In short, we are animals who are anything but well equipped to make financial investments!
This is very discouraging for us private investors. Especially since we also know that a group decision is always more 'fair' (in the rational and consistent sense) than an individual decision (where the subjective has too much weight because it is not subject to a critical eye). I am definitely not trying to cheer you up... but read on: In fact, what behavioral finance teaches us is that our brain (read: our history, our emotions, our past, etc.) comes to disturb reflections that should be rational. We have chosen an investment policy, but it is subject to the throes of our 'moods'. In other words, it is not so much the investment policy that counts as following it in a disciplined, systematic, obsessive manner, I want to say. If you think that the trading high frequency is the best way to make money, so do it and don't change your policy. Not only will it avoid the subjectivity of decisions (partly) but most importantly you will also gain experience.
It is for all these reasons that the pursuit of high dividends is probably an excellent policy for the individual and private investor: the framework is clear (no stocks with less than x% dividends), easy to implement, easy to stick to (there is still a relatively large choice of stocks with high dividends and whose track record is good). We can of course lie to ourselves but deviation is difficult when faced with such clear and transparent criteria.
There are certainly investment professionals (or not) who do better than chasing dividends in terms of long-term returns. But the trade-off in the equation time invested + security + ease of investment policy + elimination of subjectivity = returns the high dividend policy is certainly the best one can follow.
Discover more from dividendes
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Thank you Armand for this interesting article. I have long researched how to combat this problem and it is dividends and low volatility stocks that have allowed me to free myself from it. Excellent insight in any case, thank you.
All this reminds me of one of my first philosophy classes at university (a long time ago, 35 years ago) where a professor (who was on the excellent show "Ce soir ou jamais" a while ago) explained that we could only see an object from a certain point of view (angle of view) and obviously never completely or all at once... it's the same for thought, it's often easier to establish the prerequisites of our incapacities, this avoids wasting time and getting lost in dead-end paths...
An aphorism of Kant applies well to the stock market: "we measure the intelligence of an individual by the number of uncertainties he is capable of supporting",,,
There is an excellent book by Lars Tvede "The Psychology of Financial Markets" which lays out this prerequisite in a concise manner with the little graph on the cover of the book,,,
This aside from what I find innovative, paradoxical and interesting on Div.ch are the attitudes of degrowth, autonomy of life at all levels, using the income of capitalist societies to the full,,, LOL
(I should point out that I did the second work on my MOB myself and as for the vehicle, I forgot about the garage LOL)
Hello and thank you for the comment. We know that if we do not see everything it is not only a 'philosophical' approach but physical. The eye is imperfect and does not see where the optic nerve is attached to the eyeball. The brain compensates for the missing 'pixels', hence the great difficulty for the police to ask witnesses what they saw: it is the brain that creates the missing passage of the story, with all that this has of randomness.
MOB? Nice remark and very fair, but it may not apply to all members of dividendes.ch, especially to Jérôme ;-)))
"Kant's aphorism applies well to the stock market: we measure an individual's intelligence by the number of uncertainties he is able to bear."
I didn't know it but I find this maxim very relevant
"This aside from what I find innovative, paradoxical and interesting on Div.ch are the attitudes of degrowth, autonomy of life at all levels, using the income of capitalist societies to the full,,, LOL"
Yes, I admit it's even a bit schizophrenic at times 😉
MOB = timber frame house 🙂
I also recommend the first part of the excellent book "What works on Wall Street" which also deals with the subject (those who know how to search will find the ebook for free thanks to Google)...