That's it. You've made it. Your investments are bringing in enough cash and you're thinking, "But what am I going to do with all this?" ? This is already a good sign, you are on the right track, but the question is more subtle than it seems. Of course, it depends on you, your age, your situation, your expenses, your salary...
If you are already a rentier and you lack income, this windfall will go directly into your checking account to cover your needs. A working person in their thirties who lives well but no more will be able to afford a little extra, like inviting his wife to a nice restaurant. The important thing is to treat yourself. Money for money's sake is useless. Even a long-term investor may want to indulge in a little extra at some point. This is the great advantage of dividends: you can do what you want with them, over time..
However, those who made their fortunes on the stock market, such as Warren Buffett, do not like reckless spending: $100 saved today can turn into $1,000 tomorrow provided they are well invested. Reinvesting dividends rather than spending them can therefore prove very lucrative.
Wharton University finance professor Jeremy Siegel studied the importance of dividends in his book "The Future for Investors" (...). Between 1871 and 2003, Siegel found that 97% of the appreciation of stock valuations after inflation came from the reinvestment of dividends and only 3% from the increase in shares. Indeed, In bear markets, dividends act as a buffer against losses by generating income.. By reinvesting these, the individual shareholder will hold a greater number of shares, which will have a leverage effect in periods of market growth (...). Johnson & Johnson: purchase of 13 shares for USD 2,000 in 1980. Thanks to the divisions of the nominal value and the reinvestment of dividends, the investor holds 2,000 shares in 2007 for a total valuation of USD 140,000.
Source : http://www.bourse-investir.com/dividendes.html
Ok, tout ceci est bien beau me direz-vous, mais réinvestir 2% de dividende, ça peut coûter très cher en brokerage fees. C'est vrai. Pour cela, les américains, toujours en avance sur la "Vieille Europe", ont inventé le doux nom de “DRIP” (Dividend Reinvestment Plan), allowing automatic reinvestment of dividends without fees. Unfortunately, DRIPS are not common on the old continent. We have nevertheless found some a worthy of interest, that of Novartis, appearing in the values to follow of our portfolioIt is aimed at people residing in Switzerland, France, Liechtenstein or the United Kingdom.
While this method is inexpensive and has the advantage of putting you on autopilot (avoiding decisions made under the influence of emotion), it nevertheless carries a risk. Indeed, by systematically adding to the same position, not only can you miss more interesting opportunities, but above all you potentially increase the risk of loss on this value. It is the eternal debate between the concentration dear to Warren Buffett and the diversification dear to Benjamin Graham.
The "lost decade" (2000-2010) showed us that Even large caps with a reputation for being solid can go bankrupt. (Enron, Lehman Brothers, Swissair) or near-bankruptcy (UBS). We therefore believe that despite all the good things we can think of a company, it is better not to put all your eggs in one basket. Not only do we avoid forming too emotional a relationship with a stock, but above all it forces us to stay on the lookout for new opportunities.
The idea is therefore rather to constitute a portfolio comportant plusieurs valeurs ramenant un apport régulier d'argent frais. En combinant les versements de ces divers titres, on peut acheter un nouveau titre à des coûts relativement raisonnables. L'autre point, c'est qu'en se focalisant sur des growing dividends, la manne à disposition sera de plus en plus importante au fil du temps, ce qui permet d'acheter plus de positions et/ou de diminuer encore la part de frais de courtage.
Discover more from dividendes
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Some studies have also shown the interest in periods of decline as I had specified in this article
Once again, we are really behind in Europe...
For my part, I much prefer to cash my dividends in cash in my brokerage account and choose as I go along which company I will distribute this accumulated capital to. I would not want to automatically buy back shares of a company if I judge that the price is too high compared to the intrinsic value…
Yes, that's my opinion too. Automatic reinvestments are inexpensive and valid if the portfolio is not well-stocked with dividend-paying securities. But as soon as you have a choice, it's better to pay a little commission and choose when and in what you invest.
Good morning,
Thank you for this information for the Novartis Action Plan. I find the system interesting and in particular with the free purchase and deposit orders, as well as for reinvestments.
Do you know of other stocks with a similar plan? I know that it exists on US stocks but it is not really obvious for European investors. In France, pure registered accounts also exist (Air Liquide is known for this) but no automatic reinvestment to my knowledge, and no free stock market fees.
THANKS.
you must look for your happiness here:
http://web.archive.org/web/20150210175508/http://dripdatabase.com/International_DRIPs.aspx
Good article for beginners like me who only started 1 year ago.
I quite agree on reinvesting dividends in various stocks to increase your portfolio and make yourself a little more secure. As they say, "Don't put all your eggs in one basket."