5 Ideal Dividend Payers for Future Rentiers

A dream not so far away...

There is no doubt that the market is gloomy. Since 1998, apart from a few interesting entry points such as in 2003 and 2009, there have been few opportunities to obtain extraordinary returns. The fault lies with a bubble that emerged on the stock market in 1997 and that we are still paying for today. The good news is that we are once again getting closer to a market valuation correct. It will certainly take a little more time, an improvement in the fundamentals of the economy and/or some corrections on the market, but it is an opportunity to already think about the future...

In a previous article, we were interested in ideal securities for rentiers. Today we are looking at those that allow you to become one. In this case, the income received today loses importance in favor of that tomorrow. What matters is therefore the the company's ability to significantly and sustainably increase its dividend. With an investment horizon of 10 years, most dividend payers that pay increasing dividends become more interesting than those that pay high but stable distributions. This is often the case even below this interval. Beyond that, increasing dividends are significantly more lucrative, thanks to the magic of compound interest. For example, a company that offers a performance of 3% today and which makes it grow at an annual rate of 10%, makes it possible to obtain a return on the purchase price of 4.8% in 5 years, 7.8% in 10 years, 12.5% in 15 years, 20.2% in 20 years, etc.

READ  Investing your money: what solutions?

The strategy of increasing dividends therefore makes it possible to preparing the ground for a future rentier. It requires patience because the income may seem modest at first, but it clearly pays off in the long term. However, it requires focusing on quality companies that are strong enough to pay and grow their distributions over the long term, regardless of the micro or macroeconomic situation.

Maslov's Pyramid

Traditionally, these companies are found in sectors such as consumer goods and/or healthcare. If we refer to the Maslov's pyramid of needs, individuals first meet their physiological needs, before thinking about meeting their other needs, particularly social ones. In times of crisis, they would therefore use their income essentially to ensure their primary survival needs, the rest being set aside to ensure security needs. Although sometimes contested, Maslov's theory explains quite well the defensive nature of societies active in consumer goods and health.

Furthermore, these securities must display a certain margin of safety in relation to the payment of their dividends. If profits easily cover distributions, this means that the dividend can be increased in the future, even if the company goes through a bad period.

In summary, we must therefore focus on quality actions which:

  • show long-term stability in dividend payments
  • are experiencing a substantial growth rate in their distributions
  • generate sufficient profits to ensure future payments and growth
READ  Bank, broker: which ones to choose for investing?

By selecting the first five values of our portfolio, namely CL, PG, WMT, CLX And JNJ, we obtain on average a yield of 2.7%, for an annual growth of 12.4%, with 44 consecutive years of dividend increases and a distribution ratio of 43.7%. These five titles can therefore constitute an excellent basis for a future rentier portfolio (within a time horizon of at least 10 years).

Even if the income sought is a priority, we do not want the capital to deteriorate. It can in fact be used gradually during the transition to active annuitant, or kept for a possible inheritance. By focusing on sustainable and quality securities, we ensure the preservation and growth of capital.. However, we must also take into account the currency risk, even if in the long term this effect tends to diminish compared to the profitability of shares.

Investing only in domestic stocks may seem like a good idea at first glance, but that is to forget that Globalization has made the notion of a national market completely obsolete.. Wanting to avoid the weakness of the dollar or the euro by investing in Japanese, Swiss or Canadian companies means buying companies that will have to export to countries where the currency is weaker than theirs, and therefore reduce their margins. It will be argued that we can limit ourselves to smaller companies that work only on the domestic market, but here too we forget that they depend on the good health of large capitalizations, their subcontracting, their purchases and the income of their employees.

READ  Tax withholdings on partnerships listed on the US stock exchange from 01.01.2023

In short, rather than wondering about the currency in which we invest, it is better to focus on the quality of the security. In this case The best providers of growing dividends are currently in the US market. On the other hand, to cover your back, you can complete this portfolio with a title like CVX, 4e oil company in the world, generous in dividends and which offers good protection against fluctuations in the dollar.

Chevron against the dollar


Discover more from dividendes

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

15 thoughts on “5 payeurs de dividendes idéaux pour futurs rentiers”

  1. Very interesting post. We often forget that companies that regularly increase their dividends offer a great return after a few years. We just have to let the snowball grow.

    More generally, the situation on the markets shows that dividends are an essential component of performance. In my portfolio, it is the dividends that allow me not to do too badly over the past month.

  2. Yes, indeed, dividends limit the damage when markets are in a bad direction. In addition, this injection of fresh money allows for regular reinvestment, which limits the risk of buying at the wrong time (dollar cost averaging) and transforms bearish periods into magnificent buying opportunities. The choice can of course be made on the stock that paid the dividend, but also on any other stock, thus ensuring even more diversification.

  3. Hi,

    Interesting post indeed. I am looking to get into the stock market but without too much risk. A long-term vision over 10 years appeals to me a lot.
    Quick question: does a planned investment fit with this type of stock? Will investing a set amount each month to purchase these 5 stocks allow you to obtain high-yield dividends in the long term?

    THANKS

    1. Investing every month has the advantage of reducing the risk of buying at the wrong time. However, this method also has 2 negative effects. The first is that with each purchase you reduce your return a little compared to your purchase cost. This is not too serious, given that the returns on your previous purchases are increasing, but you have to be aware of it. The second, and this depends a lot on your broker, is that you can leave a lot of money in commission fees. One solution would be to space out purchases on a quarterly basis for example.

  4. Hello Jerome
    Speaking of brokers, and I know that this is not your vocation on your site, if there was only one and only one… which one…?

    The answer will be difficult, I understand, so as a Swiss citizen, would you have an objective opinion on CIM bank (http://www.cimbanque.com/fr/LaBanque.aspx) , Swiss bank with which I wish to open an account?

    Thank you for the quality of your book.
    Claude.

    1. never heard of it…!

      Personally, I don't have a broker, I invest, I don't trade, so I go directly through my bank...

      Thank you for your compliments Claude

  5. Another question, Jerome.
    Since my first commenter (which is old I know) but the idea is still there. I read a little to get more information and I looked at how I could proceed.
    As previously requested, my intention is to set up a scheduled investment (quarterly :-)) and I see in your response to the previous comment that you advise going directly through the bank. I contacted my bank and the rates for custody and transaction fees are much higher in the bank than with an online broker (even more true for US securities)
    An example at a broker the rate is:
    NYSE, Nasdaq and Amex: €5 + 0.10%

    Is it more profitable to subscribe to a broker in a programmed investment plan?

    THANKS
    Romuald

    1. Yes indeed if you prefer to make regular orders with relatively small amounts you certainly have an interest in going through a broker. You have to do your calculations and compare the offers between brokers and banks. Personally I did it and I would not gain anything from going through a broker, but my position movements are rare.

  6. Yes of course I will still look but a priori the online offers seem cheaper.
    Anyway, thanks for the info.

    1. Hello Maxime, last year's dividend in any case not!
      To receive the dividend you must buy it before the famous EX date, not the day before the payment, because it will be too late.

  7. A very interesting article.
    Indeed, as an investor, we cannot afford to neglect securities that have been paying a growing dividend for several years.
    I have been building my Pea portfolio (I am French) for a year and a half with this approach.
    However, I have no doubt that one day or another it will be necessary to invest in the American market and in these stocks which fit completely into my strategy.

  8. Good morning,

    Very interesting and informative article. Just one question:

    What do you think of equity funds focusing on growing dividends with attractive returns?
    For example, I want to invest a few thousand euros in the fund: DWS TOP DIVIDEND
    What is your opinion? Is it interesting?
    Knowing that I go through life insurance to invest in this fund, it costs me "only" 0.5% in fees per year and 0.6% in fees on each payment... and that the fund has made +11.23% to date after rising to almost +14% a few days ago...
    Looking forward to hearing from you, I wish you a great day.

    Best regards,

    Florian.

    1. The original is always better than the copy, but if you want to diversify effectively with relatively little cash at your disposal, an ETF or a fund of this type can be useful. I present some of these ETFs in my strategy Ex-US. First of all, you have to be wary of the fees that can significantly eat into the capital gains of the securities. In this case, the fees you mentioned, 0.5% per year, seem affordable. On the other hand, I find the 0.6% on payments a little expensive. I looked at the fund, the securities that make it up seem interesting, with some nice blue chips. However, be careful, the strategy says it wants to focus not necessarily on growing dividends, but on high dividends, from large capitalizations. The goal is therefore a little different, even if the fact of selecting large companies means that we often come across American companies with growing dividends. The portfolio is also very "dollar" oriented.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *